By Ethan Huff
Far from the neutral law enforcement agency it perhaps used to be, today’s FBI operates almost solely as a political weapon to punish Republicans who veer too far from the script.
Take Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) as one recent example. The FBI is now investigating him for allegations that he had sexual relations with a 17-year-old girl whom he allegedly paid to travel with him. The Biden Crime Family, meanwhile, is not under any investigation at all for its litany of not only criminal but treasonous behavior.
The FBI also infamously went after Donald Trump and his campaign back in 2016 for the “Russian collusion” conspiracy, which was quickly determined to be a hoax. No proper investigation was ever conducted into the Clinton Crime Cartel, though.
Hopefully you are starting to see the pattern. Only Republicans seem to ever face the ire of the FBI, while Democrats who often commit far worse crimes go unscathed and untouched.
“That investigation ultimately found no evidence of such collusion, but that didn’t stop media outlets from publishing thousands of articles over a two-year period featuring quotes from ‘sources familiar with the matter,’” notes Daily Wire reporter Ashe Schow about the Russian collusion debacle.
“During the Russigate investigation, reporters spent years writing ‘bombshell’ stories that turned out to be nothing but hype to keep the Left hungry and believing that someday soon, it would be proved that they didn’t actually lose the election in 2016 – it was stolen from them.”
FBI chose to pursue Gaetz leaks but not Biden leaks
As for Gaetz, whether or not he is guilty of the allegations made against him is irrelevant. The point is that the thus far unsubstantiated leaks concerning Gaetz are being actively pursued by the FBI as if they are real, while the leaks from Hunter Biden’s laptop, comparatively, are being ignored.
The FBI had supposedly started investigating Hunter back in 2018, but that investigation was reportedly put on hold because of a bureau policy against “overt” actions that might impact the outcome of the election.
The irony, of course, is that the FBI had no problem interfering with Trump’s election in 2016 by participating in the “Russian collusion” charade. It was apparently not a bureau policy to avoid doing that then when a Republican was running for office.
“The FBI appears ready and willing to leak stories that are harmful to Republicans while neglecting their core mission of keeping Americans safe from serious threats” when it comes to Democrats, Schow explains about the FBI’s double standard.
The FBI also knew well in advance about – and arguably helped facilitate – all of the more well-known false flag shootings and yet did nothing to stop them. The reason for this appears to once again be politically motivated in an effort to chip away at the Second Amendment.
“The Fort Hood shooter, the Boston Marathon bombers, the Pulse nightclub shooter, the Boulder grocery store shooter, the Parkland shooter, and many others were all known to the FBI prior to committing their acts of domestic terrorism,” Schow reveals.
“Yet, they slipped through the cracks, and Americans paid dearly for it. Instead of hearing about the FBI thwarting real domestic threats, we continue to hear more about the FBI’s role in leaks to the press, primarily at Republicans’ expense.”
Slipped through the cracks, perhaps. More than likely, though, it was all intentional to push the left-wing, anti-gun agenda.
To keep up with the latest news about the FBI, be sure to check out Corruption.news.
Sources for this article include: