Press "Enter" to skip to content

BREAKING: Pentagon REFUSES To Interfere In 2020 Election After Biden Suggests Military May Remove Trump

Democrats asked the Pentagon to interfere in the election. America’s top general said no.


Today a letter from the United States’ most senior military official, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley, explained that in his view the United States military is meant to be “apolitical” and he does not intend for it to take sides in the upcoming presidential election.

“The Constitution and laws of the US and the states establish procedures for carrying out elections, and for resolving disputes over the outcome of elections,” wrote Milley in a letter sent to two members of Congress. “I do not see the US military as part of this process.”

Milley continued, “In the event of a dispute over some aspect of the elections, by law U.S. courts and the U.S. Congress are required to resolve any disputes, not the U.S. Military.”

“I believe deeply in the principle of an apolitical U.S. military.”

This comes after Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden floated the idea of involving the military in the 2020 election, claiming that if he were to lose, President Donald Trump would refuse to concede and may need to be escorted away from the White House by military police.

Democrats also experienced such a scenario while role playing a war game of the 2020 election, in which the New York Times and other mainstream media reported that former Clinton campaign manager John Podesta, while role playing as Biden, refused to concede the election to President Trump.

In the war game, Podesta, again playing as Biden, refused to concede the election, bringing the country to the point of secession and civil war. The war game was only stopped when it became apparent that the American public would look toward the military to involve themselves and determine whether Biden or President Trump were the legally elected president.

It was initially unclear what the significance of ending the war game at this point was, as legally the military is not allowed to involve itself with elections. Milley’s letter now seems to reiterate this law as a matter of policy.

One of the war game’s organizers, Georgetown law professor Rosa Brooks, claimed that “All of our scenarios ended in both street-level violence and political impasse.”

Despite this war game suggesting Biden may refuse to concede and bring the country into uncharted territory, Democrats have repeatedly suggested that President Trump will refuse to concede the election, with mainstream media publications echoing the concern.

The Guardian published an opinion column titled “What if Trump loses but refuses to leave office? Here’s the worst case scenario,” The Intercept published the ominous headline “What If Trump Won’t Leave?” and Politico asked, “What if Trump won’t accept 2020 defeat?” all between June and August.

Milley’s letter was written in response to Democratic Reps. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan and Mikie Sherrill of New Jersey following a July meeting of the Armed Services Committee.

This is a developing news story and may be updated as additional facts become available.



  1. Gee Palis Gee Palis August 30, 2020

    Kaos is the name of the game. I am sure that the election will have induced issues. Election security is the key, citizenship a must and ID proof is needed upon voting. No mail-in accepted one week prior to election date so they can be properly verified and counted by 12 midnight election night. All votes must be counted and submitted by 12 midnight election night or they do not count. No if, and, or but, If states, counties can not provide mail-in and in- person verified vote by 12 midnight they do not count.

  2. JOHN W JOHN W August 30, 2020

    They have no ethics, no morals, no shame and no Brains! Biden and Company are a corrupt and failing Organization, with no plan’s to do anything good for America! what a shame and waste of humanity! They also are paranoid! Why else would you ask the U.S. Military to intervene in an Election? What’s next? Their in-house Judges?

Comments are closed.